Preparing Columbia

Thumbnail for Columbia on 747.jpg Columbia returned to the Kennedy Space Center piggyback on NASA's 747 after its "60 Million mile checkup" in March 2001 and STS-107 was supposed to be its next mission. However NASA managers decided to give the STS-109 Hubble servicing mission priority over STS-107 and pushed it ahead.


Thumbnail for sts109 launch.jpg Thumbnail for Hubble post-deploy.jpg STS-109 launched on March 1, 2002. The crew made five spacewalks to add a new advanced camera and make improvements to the Hubble Space Telescope.

The shuttle has two independent Freon loops that are used for cooling, similar to the Freon loops in an air conditioner. Every piece of electrical equipment on the shuttle, many chemical reactions, and even the crew generates heat. The Freon loops are used to maintain proper temperatures for the equipment and a comfortable crew cabin temperature for the astronauts. If one loop doesn't work the shuttle can still safely return to Earth. The flow in the primary loop dropped from 305 pounds per hour to 225 pounds per hour after Columbia arrived on orbit. Fortunately the leak didn't get worse and the rest of the mission was accomplished as planned.

Thumbnail for sts109 landing.jpg The STS-109 mission ended with a landing March 12. Nobody knew that that would be Columbia's final successful mission.

Thumbnail for Freon loop location.jpg After the STS-109 mission the cooling lines were X-rayed to determine the clog's location. The clog was caused by material which had somehow been left behind when the lines were upgraded in the early 1980s. The piece of brazing material had flown on over a dozen missions until it was dislodged during STS-109’s launch where it fluttered in front of the orifice causing the reduced Freon flow. The Freon was removed from the lines and recycled, the piece of metal which caused the clog was removed and the system was repressurized.


Spacehab and FREESTAR were installed inside Columbia's payload bay on May 24, 2002.

Thumbnail for 02pd0752 install payload in Columbia.jpg Thumbnail for 02pd0977 cargo bay.jpg Thumbnail for 02pd0979 cargo bay.jpg


Thumbnail for Columbia flowliner.jpg Thumbnail for 02pd1111 inspecting Columbia's flowliner.jpg Columbia was ready to leave its hangar on June 24th but put on hold when tiny cracks were discovered on the 'flowliners' of Atlantis and Discovery. The flowliners act like baffles to keep the propellants flowing smoothly through the shuttle's plumbing on its way to the main engines. Because of the flowliner cracks NASA decided to delay STS-107 until after STS-112 and STS-113.


An inspection of Discovery's thrusters revealed that the torque on its nuts was improperly set. Instead of testing on the torque on Columbia's nuts which would entail hazardous operations engineers decided to add crow's feet clamps over the nuts for a belt-and-suspenders approach. Even if Columbia's nuts had the wrong torque setting and the vibrations loosened them the crow's feet would prevent the nuts from turning any further.

Thumbnail for RCS thruster.jpg Thumbnail for crow's feet on thrusters.JPG Thumbnail for crow's foot 1.JPG Thumbnail for crow's foot 2.jpg


Columbia finally left its hangar on November 18, 2002. It was rolled over to the Vehicle Assembly Building where it was mated to its External Tank and Solid Rocket Boosters and rolled out to the launch pad on December 9.

Columbia's rollover from the OPF to VAB
Thumbnail for 02pd1764 rollover OPF to VAB.jpg
Columbia enters the VAB
Thumbnail for 02pd1766 Columbia entering VAB.jpg
Columbia's rollout as seen from inside the Launch Control Center
Thumbnail for 02pd1884 rollout from LCC.jpg
Columbia arrives at launch pad 39A
Thumbnail for 02pd1893 stack on MLP.jpg
Columbia on its launch platform
Thumbnail for 02pd1892 on Pad 39A.jpg


Thumbnail for BSTRAs.gif One other issue was a potential delay to Columbia's launch. Each of the propulsion lines has several "Ball Strut Tie-rod Assemblies" (BSTRAs). The BSTRAs are ball-and-socket joints which give the propulsion lines some flexibility as they vibrate back and forth during launch. Cracks were discovered on Discovery's BSTRAs and NASA went through several weeks of analysis before concluding that it was okay to fly as is, without inspecting Columbia's BSTRAs.
Thumbnail for OV-103 cracked BSTRA.jpg

Photos from the author's collection and NASA.

Home

copyright 2005 Philip Chien All Rights Reserved